zed246
2005-09-10 17:54:54 UTC
just an inchy bitsy bit of spoiler for the KoD prologue is included in
this post. Nothing too specific, just a general thing. However, if you
hadn't read it and don't want to know ANYTHING about it before you do -
then you are here by warned.
Now:
The question I'm asking is quite simple: does the Lord of Chaos rules?
In the sixth book the DO order to the forsaken still alive and found
(we have no evidence that same order was given to Aran'gar, Osan'gar,
Ishy, Moghy and Lanfear except that it is logical) is "LET THE LORD OF
CHAOS RULE".
Now, it seems that the general idea is to creat chaos all over
randland. But in following books there is hardly any that seems to
originate from the forsaken.
The Aiel, Illian, Seafolk, Cairhien and the Border Lands seems to be
uneffected at all.
TAS does have a-lot of problems and chaos as the Ajahs are at each
other's throats so Masa'ana did her job. On the other hand, SAS had
been on a steady way from the start. True, there are the two factions
led by Lelaine and Romanda but that's just normal Aes Sedai politics.
So where's the chaos when the SAS seems to almost overwhelm the TAS,
with or without Eg?
Graendal was making more chaos of the already chaotic Arad-Doman but to
what cause? I mean, the country already was in a civil war and ripped
by Dragon Sworn. Where's the point?
We don't know where Demandred is but it is possible that he's the one
behind the siege on Caemlyn (I'm getting this from the T'A'R scene with
him in LoC in the Throne Room where he says "Let the Lord of Chaos
rule!"). If he is behind that than alright, but isn't that relatively
small, considering that the country itself dosen't seems to be in
chaos?
The only other example of chaos before KoD is Tear - the rebells from
Hadon's Mirk trying to take the Stone, but again - the country doesn't
seems to be in chaos.
So where's all that big chaos they talked about? The only real example
of true chaos in the prologue to KoD.
On the other hand we see the Seanchen bringing order to all of their
lands and Murandy starting to form into a solid country. This is
actualy the reverse of chaos.
It seems that if only the forsaken had left things as they were (minus
the TAS) they might have done better. Rand would have no reason to take
Tear, Andor and Illian and Murandy will not try to form up since they
would not see such a great threat. The nations would hardly know the
Dragon Reborn and would never follow him unless he will make them,
which will make a-lot more chaos than the present situation.
If they had realy wanted to make things worse they should have touch
the Border Lands, kill some Murandy lords and Wave Mistresses and so
on.
Even what Sammael had done to the Shaido didn't do much since many had
just been destroyed and it seems they would have made more chaos as a
big tribe, rather then many seperate septs.
Have the forsaken all failed?
this post. Nothing too specific, just a general thing. However, if you
hadn't read it and don't want to know ANYTHING about it before you do -
then you are here by warned.
Now:
The question I'm asking is quite simple: does the Lord of Chaos rules?
In the sixth book the DO order to the forsaken still alive and found
(we have no evidence that same order was given to Aran'gar, Osan'gar,
Ishy, Moghy and Lanfear except that it is logical) is "LET THE LORD OF
CHAOS RULE".
Now, it seems that the general idea is to creat chaos all over
randland. But in following books there is hardly any that seems to
originate from the forsaken.
The Aiel, Illian, Seafolk, Cairhien and the Border Lands seems to be
uneffected at all.
TAS does have a-lot of problems and chaos as the Ajahs are at each
other's throats so Masa'ana did her job. On the other hand, SAS had
been on a steady way from the start. True, there are the two factions
led by Lelaine and Romanda but that's just normal Aes Sedai politics.
So where's the chaos when the SAS seems to almost overwhelm the TAS,
with or without Eg?
Graendal was making more chaos of the already chaotic Arad-Doman but to
what cause? I mean, the country already was in a civil war and ripped
by Dragon Sworn. Where's the point?
We don't know where Demandred is but it is possible that he's the one
behind the siege on Caemlyn (I'm getting this from the T'A'R scene with
him in LoC in the Throne Room where he says "Let the Lord of Chaos
rule!"). If he is behind that than alright, but isn't that relatively
small, considering that the country itself dosen't seems to be in
chaos?
The only other example of chaos before KoD is Tear - the rebells from
Hadon's Mirk trying to take the Stone, but again - the country doesn't
seems to be in chaos.
So where's all that big chaos they talked about? The only real example
of true chaos in the prologue to KoD.
On the other hand we see the Seanchen bringing order to all of their
lands and Murandy starting to form into a solid country. This is
actualy the reverse of chaos.
It seems that if only the forsaken had left things as they were (minus
the TAS) they might have done better. Rand would have no reason to take
Tear, Andor and Illian and Murandy will not try to form up since they
would not see such a great threat. The nations would hardly know the
Dragon Reborn and would never follow him unless he will make them,
which will make a-lot more chaos than the present situation.
If they had realy wanted to make things worse they should have touch
the Border Lands, kill some Murandy lords and Wave Mistresses and so
on.
Even what Sammael had done to the Shaido didn't do much since many had
just been destroyed and it seems they would have made more chaos as a
big tribe, rather then many seperate septs.
Have the forsaken all failed?